LicenseGuard

Is pyside6 safe for commercial use?

PyPI package · License: LGPL-3.0-only OR GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only

pyside6 is licensed under LGPL-3.0-only OR GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only. Nothing below is blocked, but it carries a source-disclosure obligation — what triggers it differs by how you ship, so read the table.

Can I use pyside6 in SaaS, a distributed app, or internally?

How you ship itResultWhy
Hosted SaaS No obligation This package offers a choice of licenses. The least restrictive option is shown. LGPL-3.0-only requires publishing modifications to the library itself, but under dynamic linking that obligation does not extend to the code that calls it.
Distributed binary / app No obligation This package offers a choice of licenses. The least restrictive option is shown. LGPL-3.0-only requires publishing modifications to the library itself, but under dynamic linking that obligation does not extend to the code that calls it.
Delivered to customer No obligation This package offers a choice of licenses. The least restrictive option is shown. LGPL-3.0-only requires publishing modifications to the library itself, but under dynamic linking that obligation does not extend to the code that calls it.
Internal use only No obligation This package offers a choice of licenses. The least restrictive option is shown. LGPL-3.0-only requires publishing modifications to the library itself, but under dynamic linking that obligation does not extend to the code that calls it.
Published library No obligation This package offers a choice of licenses. The least restrictive option is shown. LGPL-3.0-only requires publishing modifications to the library itself, but under dynamic linking that obligation does not extend to the code that calls it.

What obligations does pyside6 carry?

Source disclosureAttribution

If you only use it at build time, the answer changes.

This package offers a choice of licenses. The least restrictive option is shown. LGPL-3.0-only appears as a dev dependency, so it is not part of the artifact you ship. Distribution-triggered obligations do not arise. Tools that emit code into your output, such as code generators, are a separate case worth checking individually.

Questions this page answers

Is pyside6 safe for commercial use?

pyside6 is licensed under LGPL-3.0-only OR GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only. Nothing below is blocked, but it carries a source-disclosure obligation — what triggers it differs by how you ship, so read the table.

Can I use pyside6 (LGPL-3.0-only OR GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only) in hosted saas?

This package offers a choice of licenses. The least restrictive option is shown. LGPL-3.0-only requires publishing modifications to the library itself, but under dynamic linking that obligation does not extend to the code that calls it.

Can I use pyside6 (LGPL-3.0-only OR GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only) in distributed binary / app?

This package offers a choice of licenses. The least restrictive option is shown. LGPL-3.0-only requires publishing modifications to the library itself, but under dynamic linking that obligation does not extend to the code that calls it.

Can I use pyside6 (LGPL-3.0-only OR GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only) in delivered to customer?

This package offers a choice of licenses. The least restrictive option is shown. LGPL-3.0-only requires publishing modifications to the library itself, but under dynamic linking that obligation does not extend to the code that calls it.

Can I use pyside6 (LGPL-3.0-only OR GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only) in internal use only?

This package offers a choice of licenses. The least restrictive option is shown. LGPL-3.0-only requires publishing modifications to the library itself, but under dynamic linking that obligation does not extend to the code that calls it.

Can I use pyside6 (LGPL-3.0-only OR GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only) in published library?

This package offers a choice of licenses. The least restrictive option is shown. LGPL-3.0-only requires publishing modifications to the library itself, but under dynamic linking that obligation does not extend to the code that calls it.

Does pyside6 matter if it is only a build-time or dev dependency?

This package offers a choice of licenses. The least restrictive option is shown. LGPL-3.0-only appears as a dev dependency, so it is not part of the artifact you ship. Distribution-triggered obligations do not arise. Tools that emit code into your output, such as code generators, are a separate case worth checking individually.

This page covers one package. Your requirements.txt has many more.

Check your whole manifest →

How was this determined?

The license was read from the PyPI registry, then evaluated against each shipping model. Only the declared license is considered; code copied into a project's own source files is not detected by this method.

License data last reviewed .

LicenseGuard reports information derived from published license texts and dependency manifests. It is not legal advice and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Results reflect license metadata as declared; they do not identify every obligation or violation. Consult qualified counsel for decisions that matter.

Listed in the official MCP registry, on Glama and on Smithery. Source on GitHub (Apache-2.0).